As the understanding of global security evolves, climate change has been firmly established as a critical peace issue by many, including the Nobel committee. For Donald Trump, a vocal climate change skeptic, this creates a formidable “green barrier” that may be impossible to overcome in his quest for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The basis for Trump’s nomination is the 2020 Abraham Accords, a foreign policy achievement in a different domain. His supporters argue that his work in traditional diplomacy should be judged on its own merits. However, the Nobel committee is known for its forward-looking perspective, and it increasingly views environmental stability as a prerequisite for lasting peace.
The link between climate change and conflict is well-documented. Resource scarcity, forced migration, and extreme weather events can all act as “threat multipliers,” exacerbating tensions and leading to violence. By awarding the prize to environmental champions in the past, the committee has signaled its recognition of this reality.
This is what makes Trump’s record so problematic. His decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement was not just a policy choice; it was a rejection of the global consensus and a blow to the cooperative framework designed to address this threat. Historian Theo Zenou put it bluntly: “I don’t think they would award the most prestigious prize in the world to someone who does not believe in climate change.”
A candidate’s stance on what many consider the single greatest long-term threat to global stability cannot be ignored. Trump’s denialism is not a peripheral issue; it is a central part of his political identity. For a committee concerned with the future of peace on a global scale, this position is likely a non-negotiable disqualifier.
46