Mayor Andy Burnham’s implicit challenge is not just about leadership but about economic policy, with his allies suggesting Starmer has “zero clue” how to address the structural issues facing the UK economy. This fundamental disagreement is the engine of the leadership speculation.
The leadership drama intensified after Burnham refused to definitively rule out a future challenge, providing an opening for ideological critiques of the current government’s fiscal direction. These economic jabs resonate with those on the party’s left who seek a more radical approach to public services and regional growth.
Starmer, attempting to counter the economic critique while travelling to the G20 summit, focused on the immediate task of governance. He praised Burnham, citing their effective co-operation during the sensitive response to the Manchester synagogue attack, which he called “really impressive.”
The Prime Minister’s frustration was clearly directed at the plotters, aggressively dismissing the claims that Health Secretary Wes Streeting was organizing a coup. Starmer insisted that these internal distractions are consuming time needed to focus on proving the government’s economic competence in tackling the cost-of-living crisis.
Burnham’s £1 billion Manchester growth plan, which includes major investment in social and affordable homes, is his practical rebuttal to Starmer’s centrist fiscal rules. By showcasing a different path for regional investment and wealth creation, Burnham keeps the economic policy debate—and the leadership question—alive.
23