While many diplomats and allies are unnerved by Donald Trump’s unpredictability, the UK’s ambassador to Washington has framed it as a strategic asset. Peter Mandelson praised Trump for deterring adversaries “through a blend of strength and strategic unpredictability,” arguing this approach keeps enemies off-balance.
He pointed specifically to Trump’s “decisive action on Iran’s nuclear programme” as a prime example of this doctrine in action. Mandelson claimed the strikes, beyond their military impact, “gave a swathe of malign foreign regimes pause for thought.” This suggests a belief that Trump’s seemingly erratic behaviour has a calculated, coercive effect.
This perspective challenges the conventional wisdom in foreign policy, which typically values stability, predictability, and clear communication in dealings with adversaries. Mandelson is arguing that in a world with nimble and aggressive rivals, the old diplomatic playbook of slow, incremental action is a recipe for failure.
This embrace of unpredictability aligns the UK with one of the most controversial aspects of Trump’s leadership. It signals a departure from traditional British diplomacy and a willingness to adopt a more muscular and disruptive foreign policy in concert with the United States, particularly when confronting shared threats.
71