The decision to finally enter the foldable smartphone market comes after competitors have already released multiple generations of folding devices, establishing consumer familiarity with the form factor and working through early technical challenges. This timing suggests a calculated approach rather than rushed response to competitive pressure.
Rival manufacturers have demonstrated both the opportunities and pitfalls of foldable technology through their market experiences. Early devices suffered from durability concerns, visible screen creases, and high prices that limited adoption. Later generations addressed many of these issues, proving that foldable devices can achieve mainstream viability with proper engineering.
By entering the market after rivals have pioneered the category, the company benefits from observing what works and what doesn’t without bearing the costs of early experimentation. This follower strategy has proven successful in other product categories where the brand eventually dominated markets it didn’t invent.
However, delayed entry also means forfeiting the first-mover advantages that establish brand associations with new categories. Competitors have already secured patent positions, developed supplier relationships, and built consumer awareness around their foldable offerings, creating barriers to overcome.
The company’s substantial resources, ecosystem advantages, and reputation for refined user experiences provide competitive weapons that may prove decisive despite later entry. If the first foldable iPhone delivers superior reliability, software integration, and user experience compared to existing alternatives, market leadership remains achievable.
20
previous post